Difference between revisions of "SANDBOX"

From EAGLE MediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
   
 
e.g.
 
e.g.
text = E31,
+
* text = E31,
Author = E21
+
* Author = E21
   
 
and in the form put for example something like a property P14 where to imput the name?
 
and in the form put for example something like a property P14 where to imput the name?
Line 21: Line 21:
 
-----
 
-----
   
photoshop:Headline
+
* photoshop:Headline
dc:title
+
* dc:title
photoshop:DateCreated
+
* photoshop:DateCreated
dc:creator
+
* dc:creator
daiImage:readable
+
* daiImage:readable
daiImage:responsibility
+
* daiImage:responsibility
daiImage:writable
+
* daiImage:writable
photoshop:City
+
* photoshop:City
iptc4xmlCore:Location
+
* iptc4xmlCore:Location
dc:type (evtl. + eigenes kontrolliertes Vokabular)
+
* dc:type (evtl. + eigenes kontrolliertes Vokabular)
dc:description
+
* dc:description
daiImage:number
+
* daiImage:number
dc:format (evtl. + eigenes kontrolliertes Vokabular)
+
* dc:format (evtl. + eigenes kontrolliertes Vokabular)
   
 
==Metadata schema ==
 
==Metadata schema ==

Revision as of 06:10, 11 August 2013

general table

Template:translation

Epitafio de L. Iunius Avitus HE No. 155

modulo


CAN WE work on: infobox type of template for new translations in which: opting out either for original or published (and consequent fields)

map the template to CIDOC CRM?

e.g.

  • text = E31,
  • Author = E21

and in the form put for example something like a property P14 where to imput the name?


  • photoshop:Headline
  • dc:title
  • photoshop:DateCreated
  • dc:creator
  • daiImage:readable
  • daiImage:responsibility
  • daiImage:writable
  • photoshop:City
  • iptc4xmlCore:Location
  • dc:type (evtl. + eigenes kontrolliertes Vokabular)
  • dc:description
  • daiImage:number
  • dc:format (evtl. + eigenes kontrolliertes Vokabular)

Metadata schema

  1. EAGLE metadata schema (this is the proposed metadata schema agaist which to map all the content providers schemas)
  2. EAGLE metadata comparison table (these are the proposed rules to map the content providers schemas into the EAGLE schema and the latter into EDM)

Types of descriptions